Sociology, American Style – Part 3: First Moments in Vegas

Most of my colleagues, even those who consider themselves “open-minded” and would call themselves “critical thinkers,” express deep knee-jerk loathing for the City of Las Vegas. This is my 35th trip to this fair hamlet, and while I’ve got a healthy streak of masochism running through my being, I’m no idiot (in the classic, traditional sense of the term; besides, my masochism tends to involve partial nudity, a rubber ball, and a leather riding crop). Anyway, as the plane begins its descent and I notice Las Vegas, appearing as a glittery bejeweled outcropping in a desert, I begin to worry about how much Vegas trash-talking I’m going to have to hear. As the landing gear descends, I furtively gulp my third micro-bottle of Dewar’s and think, “No, surely not … even the most stick-in-the mud sociologists will appreciate the complexities, contradictions, and multiple facets this city, like any city, presents to the onlooker, ESPECIALLY the trained onlooker (i.e., sociologist).

We’re barreling down the runway, the plane’s wing flaps straining to slow us down, and all the iPhones and Blackberrys spring to life as though they’ve all been simultaneously animated by some geeky deity in the pantheon of gods. Hell, I’m no different. I turn on my iPhone and just as start to plug in the earbuds–and thereby allow The Germs to drown out the usual stupid phone calls wherein passengers scream “Okay, stay there, I’ve just landed, I’ll be right out,” as though they’re the ones who flew the fucking plane–a cacophony of conversations erupts. I realize at that moment that this airplane truly is full of sociologists. “Okay, well, they appear to be happy,” I think. “But maybe they’re just happy they didn’t die in a fiery crash. Let’s give them benefit of the doubt,” I decide upon deeply colloguing with myself.

As I make my way to the exit, I look to my right and notice once again the Captain’s official uniform cap. It hangs from a depressingly standardized flip-out peg on the wall of the cockpit, with the top of the hat against the wall and the inside of the hat facing out. While boarding the plane four hours ago I noticed the cap, which in itself carries little interest. What intrigued me was that the Captain had placed a photograph inside of the clear plastic pouch attached to the underside of his cap, the lining that rests upon his pate when he’s wearing the military-looking lid. In the picture I see him, a woman who appears to be his wife, a mid-teens female, and a girl who looks to be about 10. It’s a staged picture, but they seem happy. They’re smiling. Wherever they are, it’s a sunny day. Life is good. In that moment. But why does it carry this picture with him? And in his hat, of all places? Why not his wallet? Or his briefcase? (Maybe I’m just feeling guilty because I “carry” my personal pictures “in” my iPhone and iPad.)

During the flight I had been thinking about this hat/picture frame, and on the way out I began wondering what my fellow sociologists would make of it. Superstition? Sentiment? A simple matter of a human personalizing his workplace. After all, the cockpit is to the pilot what the cubicle is to … most American middle class worker people. Then there’s the whole line of thought I suppressed while we were in the air: What if there’s a pragmatic reason for the picture’s placement inside his cap? Is the cap fire resistant? Is it a way for the Captain’s hat, and therefore the Captain himself, to be identified in the event of a crash? If that’s the case, then the people in charge don’t really know who’s flying this plane, in which case we’re all fucked and tattooed in the same hole. Or maybe it’s a combination of personal function and superstition, as though the pilot has decided that if he’s going to die in this airplane, he wants to be able to grab his cap and leave this world (by crashing into it, no less) while staring at those he loves most in the universe.

As a lump appears in my throat and tears begin welling in my eyes, I decide that I’m going to love everyone and everything on this trip. Don’t worry. It happens to me quite often. From nowhere these moments of rarefied, suffusive emotion absorb me, and I embrace a deep, if fleeting, love for humankind. In this case it lasts until I cross the threshold dividing the plane from the jetway.

The first thing you notice when you fly to Vegas–aside from its appearance on the desert landscape, which to me is comparable to (or with?) the presence of a darling freckle near the pubis of a lover on whom I enjoy performing cunnilingus–is the HEAT. I step into the jetway and the heat plasters me. Walking up the ramp into the terminal I can feel the desert beckoning me with a diabolical cackle: “Hello, water vessel. I am now going to suck you dry. When you drink, I drink. So drink often and in large amounts. Otherwise you will die.” So I oblige the demon desert and stop at the nearest bar. I don’t have to walk far. It’s situated about 100 feet from the gate. Which gate? Hey, remember, it’s Vegas. You can find a bar within 100 feet of ANY gate. Let’s not even talk about the slot machines. Damn. If I had a nickel for every slot machine in the LAS airport, I’d … well .. probably try to gamble those nickels and quadruple my money.

At the bar I decide to mix things up: “Gimme a Cracka!.” The bartender, nonplussed, says “What the fuck?” I clear up the confusion: “A White Russian Hillbilly.” Now, most of my kinfolk come from Appalachia, and we’re proud to call ourselves hillbillies, but of course not everyone around whom I use the term knows that. Still, though, the bartender doesn’t know what a WR Hillbilly is. “It’s a standard White Russian,” I explain in my most professorial tone of voice, “but with a splash of SoCo and a pinch of Jack Daniels.” Now he gets it. “And make it a double, in a plastic cup. Because I got some serious shit to explode.” Now, here’s a word of advice. Never say “explode” in an airport. It freaks people out, and it’s actually a crime. I think. Or at least a gross violation of normative conduct. I drink my WRH in three gulps when suddenly I realize the company I’m keeping: A phalanx of angry-looking TSA agents.

Ultimately they buy my explanation: It was an innocent, if stupid, slip of the tongue brought on by the uniquely delirious delusion that the City of Las Vegas induces in its visitors: That you are in a special place where anything goes, all the time. The airport is dressed up like a casino, for god’s sake, and every casino is dressed up to be about as disorienting as anything you’ve ever experienced. Like I say, they finally relent, half-heartedly accept my explanation, and let me go on my way. But not without a stern warning from a man with deflated baby pools for jowls: “You better be more careful in the future; or else we might not be so … so … lenient.” If an anal probe is lenient, I definitely don’t want to experience harsh.

Four body cavity searches and three hours of interrogation later, and I’m in baggage claim trying to find “a red bag, with black trim, on wheels with a handle thing.” The “lost baggage agent” seems as lost as my bag. No help. I even offer a bribe to this poor lost soul, this agent who’s probably been demoted so many times she’s now feeling lucky to be lost and rudderless in the American Airlines juggernaut. When the bribe doesn’t work, I know I’m fucked. My bag is gone. No weed smoking for me this week, I glumly conclude. (Yeah, always pack the weed in your checked bag. They rarely investigate, especially when you do what I do: stuff it inside of a lubed up, recently-used looking vibrator on which you’ve written a man’s name with a Sharpie.)

Suddenly, probably from the heavens, a man appears. He’s dashing in his black suit, white shirt, black tie. I look down and see that he’s holding my bag. How do I know it’s my bag? Because the tag on my bag advertises my advocacy for DRUG REFORM (ironic given its contents, huh?). Turns out the guy is a limo driver. A wave of nausea runs over me as I realize that he might just as well be Jesus. I run to the nearest trash can and vomit. Once I’ve finished upchucking my bad American Airlines lunch, he tenderly takes out his cloth handkerchief and plucks off a few chunks of vomit clinging to my chin hairs. “Sir, may I offer you a limousine ride to your hotel?”

And that’s how I ended up getting a limo ride from the second greatest airport in the world to one of the greatest places in the world: “The Strip” of Las Vegas, the bosom of the city, where for the next 6 days my life will nearly end, but I’ll have one hell of a time.

To be continued ….

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Sociology, American Style – Part 2: Arriving in Vegas

We’re halfway through the flight. I awake with a jolt. The Sociology grad student next to me has finished reading the article on entrepreneurship and has moved onto something about society and the spectacle. Debord? Who knows. What I know is that a line of drool runs down my chin, halfway down my neck, and I wish it were a line of coke. Which makes me wonder: How many of the 5,000 sociologists attending ASA have cocaine habits? How many will be snorting up in Vegas? How many (and exactly who) might be willing to share with me?

Sharing is not something we sociologists do very well. We hoard ideas, data, analyses, plans for publishing, etc., as though these are “things” that haven’t yet seen the light of day, as though we’ve stumbled upon something truly NEW and UNIQUE that will MATTER. As a lot, we’re exceptionally stingy. If this miserliness weren’t so fucking pathetic, it might be funny. See, we build ourselves little empires, “silos” we call them. We’re largely isolated in our work, we don’t have the incentive or social skills necessary to collaborate with others … and, here’s a gross generalization, we’re majorly insecure careerists. Hell, we’ll build a silo 50 stories high and then spend the rest of our career decrying the balkanization of our discipline! Yeah, we’re not above creating the very problems we end up studying. We are desperate. And you can smell the desperation, the fear, the self-loathing.

The fear comes from here, a very simple place: We’re frauds, and we’re scared to death that someone powerful enough might realize that all we really do is wrap uncommon sense in fancy language and get paid for it. Moreover, we build our careers on the backs of marginalized persons. Sociology needs social ills. Without social problems, without the really fucked up shit in this world, there would be no need to study it. WE’d be too busy having a good fucking time, just going along for the ride, and so forth.

So we start with problems. We dissect them. We advance our careers by extracting data from persecuted populations. And non one calls us out. Sociologists are parasites. What good have we done lately? Not a lot. None that I can think of.

Back to the flight. I ring the flight attendant and tell her I need another White Russian, make that two, one for my new friend the Ivy League grad student. “No, thanks … I’m okay,” he demurs. “Well, bring me two of ‘em then,” I instruct her. “And a turkey sandwich!” I add. “Sir, I’m all out of sandwiches …” she begins to explain. “Wait,” I interrupt, “YOU might be out of them, but what about your fellow flight attendants? Might they have turkey sandwiches? Don’t you all work together?”

Yeah, I’m an asshole. I fucking hate it when customer service agents working for some megacorporation personalize the inventory and/or services, as when the Enterprise Car Dealer agent tells me, “Sir, I don’t have a Cadillac on the lot today … but I can get you into a nice Kia.” What the fuck? YOU don’t have a Cadillac on the lot? I’m not interested in what YOU do or don’t have. I want to know what Enterprise, your employer, has on the lot. This whole personalization of service (which is partly responsible for all of us becoming “guests” wherever we spend our money) is a sociological issue. Yes, thousands of sociologist study this very thing.

You couldn’t possibly name a topic or issue that we haven’t studied and written about to the point where it’s so anemic, lifeless, so flat-on-the-slab as to be unrecognizable. That’s just what we do. We are life suckers. Take sado-masochism. Fucking hell, that’s interesting. Then go read a sociological study of pro-dommes and you’ll be bored out of your skull (unless you read the world of Danielle Lindemann, however … she’s one of the good ones).

Back to this plane. It’s a rough fucking flight. A mass of undulating passengers, riding the turbulent waves without the comforting aid of a pilot’s soothing voice or flight attendants running up and down the aisles. Long ago the co-pilot ordered the attendants to sit down and buckle up. It’s a wild ride. I love it.

A plane loaded with sociologists headed to Vegas crashes in Missouri … that’s gotta be the beginning of one funny fucking joke.

I wake up. We’re landing. I’ve got a limo waiting for me. The driver’s first question: “You like the massage with the happy ending?”

It’s Vegas. Of course I do.

To be continued ….

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Sociology, American Style

Friday, August 19, 2011

1:15 p.m. I call Blue Cab, give them the basics. Pick me up NOW because I’m running late, get me to O’Hare Airport, credit card. Send a smoking car. “Well, sir, no one’s allowed to smoke in any of our cars, but it’s really up to the individual driver,” he explains, as though he’s had to repeat this very line at least two dozen times today alone. “All right, well, send a driver who smokes.” I hang up.

1:35 p.m. The Blue Cab pulls up. You don’t know this, but the Blue Cab company is known for being grungy. It’s a local outfit, and it caters to those of us who can’t or won’t pay higher prices for better cabs. All the cars seem to be 8 cylinders from the mid- to late-80s. Clientele range from Sociology Professors like me to ambulance-chasing attorneys to prostitutes. A LOT of prostitutes. Every sex worker I know has one or two favorite cabbies … and every cabbie has at least one or two favorite prostitutes. During the ride, it occurs to me once again that I’m a magnet for dark information, seediness, ugly secrets, malevolent truths. I can’t understand a word the driver’s saying, but not because he doesn’t speak “good English.” He does. It’s just that he’s ranting about 1,000 ways to die (a cable show?) and vipers getting stabbed in the neck … and then he turns to a “lady of the night” client of his. “She’s my favorite,” he gushes. From what I gather, he takes her around on dates, waits for her while she turns the tricks, and from an 8-hour circuit he’ll make a few hundred dollars, “plus she always give me at least 2 cartons of cigarrettes … from one of the ‘johns’. He owns tobacco outlet. Got a wife, kids, but still …” he trails off. Yeah, wife, kids, whatever. Nearly every guy I know who sees a sex worker is “happily married,” living a quiet suburban life with children, an SUV, and a manicured lawn in some fucking cookie cutter subdivision out in what one such guy referred to as “God’s penalty box.”

2:00 p.m. I arrive at O’Hare. Chain smoke two cigarettes, empty the bottle of Dewar’s that’s been rattling around ominously in the bottom of my weird Euro-style ergonomically sound “this won’t fuck up your back” backpack thing. What I hate about this bag is that it’s tan. I hate tan. And anything “putty” colored. Beige. Fuck those shades. I’d rather live in gray. Which is pretty much the case anyway, morally speaking.

2:15 p.m. My flight departs in 30 minutes and I”m waiting for an anal probe by a TSA agent. Of course, as usual, as every other fucking time I’ve been to this airport in the past 10 years, I get called over for a body search. I’m to get X-Rayed and “probed” by that wand thing. What the fuck is that wand thing anyway? It’s vaguely intimidating, but also vaguely arousing. “This time,” I announce to the obviously humorless TSA agent, “I brought my own lube!” I pull a “pillow” of KY Jelly out of my watch pocket and hand it to him. But he won’t take it. “Sir,” he glowers, “you’ll have to dispose of that.”

“Well, that’s what I was hoping we’d do with it, fella,” I reply in a breathy exhale that would make Lauren Bacall blush.

“No, I mean, you’ll need to throw that away before we can take your picture.” My picture? What the fuck? It’s not my picture. It’s a goddamned X-Ray whose processing probably will kill me, as much as I have to travel. Whatever. I throw it away. “Just trying to lighten the mood, Stallion,” I call back to him.

2:40 p.m. I’m finally boarding this fucking plane. Once I enter the plane, I realize that I’m surrounded by sociologists. I don’t need to be introduced to them. I can smell them, the way a wolf smells fear. The self-loathing bubbles up in my food pipe; the peer-loathing clouds my vision. A plane full of fucking sociologists. I swear to God, if this thing crashes, it’ll be a worldwide trending joke inside of 7 days, I think to myself. Seriously, who’s gonna explain the world now? A whole shitload of sociologists just crashed and burned.

2:45 p.m. I’m in my seat. I notice that the young bespectacled man next to me is reading a journal article. I know my journal articles. I sneak a peek: “The Sociology of Entrepreneurship.” Turns out he’s an Ivy League graduate student in his third year. Really nice guy. We chat. Clearly we’re better than every layperson on the plane, maybe in all of the world, because only we can grasp how “entrepreneurship” is a collective activity, not a solitary Horatio Alger sort of enterprise. Individual business endeavors are cooperative and competitive, which is to say fundamentally sociological, phenomena. Shit, we’re so fucking smart. We explain the obvious, all day long, day in and day out. And we get paid for it. This is gonna be a great trip.

And guess what’s waiting for me at the other end? The annual convention of the American Sociological Association. This year it’s being held in Las Vegas. I order three White Russians once we’re in the air. My buddy lets me use part of his table for White Russian Storage.

“Can’t wait to see Caesar’s Palace,” the lady behind me whispers to her husband. “He’s been dead a long time.” I love people. I hate them too. But whatever, they’re my lifeblood.

One more White Russian and I fall asleep.

To be continued ….

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Hug a Librarian (Any Librarian Will Do)

When I turned 8 years old, my parents sold our house in the “ghetto” of Indianapolis and moved the family to a rural area about 40 miles west of the city. In the blink of an eye, I went from being a poor city kid attending a strict Baptist “academy” to a poor farm kid attending a public school in the middle of bum-fuck-nowhere. Through it all, I remained insatiably curious about … well … everything. I delighted in the wonders of the natural world and especially in the arcane business of adult human interaction. ”Old” people fascinated the hell out of me. My father was keen on involving me in the affairs of the adult world, usually by insisting that I put on some sort of intellectual show for my parents’ friends or for family members (math problems, spelling, etc.).

Soon after moving to the country, I discovered whole new vistas to explore, made new friends, and got settled into the relatively more relaxed public school setting. Baptist education left its physical marks on me, but it also furnished me with super-duper reading skills. Never without a book, that boy, my grandfather used to say. Books, to my young self, were like portals to new worlds … Every time I cracked open a book, I felt as though I were taking on a new identity, becoming a different person, taking up citizenship in a different society.

Acknowledging my fondness for reading, my 4th grade teacher, Mrs. Knight (bless her soul) one day told me that there was a public library around the corner from the school (Mill Creek Elementary). “What’s a public library?” I queried. “It’s a place with thousands and thousands of books, and they let you borrow them,” she patiently explained. ”For free?” I asked, incredulously of course. (Note: One of the aphorisms of my rearing was “You get what you pay for.”) “Yes, it’s free. They give you a ‘library card’ with your name on it, and that card lets you check out as many books as you want as many times as you want, forever.” An orgy of books! For free! I was beside myself with joy — I might even have been aroused. Hard to say.

That night I asked my mother if she’d allow me to go to the library after school, ALONE, and pick me up from there a couple of hours after the usual school closure time. “Sure,” she said. We were in the “transition” period defined by moving residences … and we had yet to move into our rural house, so she was driving 80 miles round trip to get me to and from my new school. No doubt the extra couple of hours, and NOT returning to the city in rush hour, came as a gift from the sky.

The next day I couldn’t wait for the bell to ring. When it did, I was ready to go. I raced out the door, around the block and stopped in front of the Clayton, IN town “library.” I use quotation marks here because, looking back, I had no way of knowing just how very different THIS library was from all the others I’d see in life. In a word, the library was a house. Not just A house. It was someone’s house. It belonged to the Head (read: only) Librarian.

Gladys and her husband Leo had lived in the house for more than 50 years. They’d been married 55 years. Soon after moving into the simple wood frame farm house, Gladys realized her lifelong dream of becoming a librarian by installing a library in the bottom floor of her house. She and Leo lived upstairs. I wish I had a picture of the place. You would find it charming. As I did.

Gladys welcomed me warmly as I cautiously gained entry through the creaky screen door. I moved cautiously because aside from the sign, “Clayton Public Library,” there was no indication that I was in the right place. This was someone’s home, for the love of soup! “Come on in, honey,” she said in a whisper of the richest luster ever experienced by human ears. “What can I do for you?” she asked. I explained the deal — that Mrs. Knight had told me about the place and that I loved books, that I couldn’t get enough of books, that I still couldn’t believe it possible to “borrow” as many books as I wanted. “Well, it’s all true,” she winked, “except that there IS a limit on how many you can borrow.” Confused, I asked, “What’s the limit?”

“Well, you can only borrow as many as you can manage to carry out of here, so unless you’ve got a wheelbarrow parked outside, I’d say you’re gonna be taking hom about a dozen books of average size.” My heart soared. My mind exploded with possibilities. But at the end of the day, I took home only one book, the book that Gladys told me to read.

Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury.

“It’s about a society where no books are allowed. And the hero is a guy, whose name is Guy, and his job is to burn books.” Gladys nicely summarized the greater part of the plot. “WHAT?” I couldn’t fathom this. How in the world could there be such a society. Suddenly I wondered if my little town were some sort of cabal — a small society of outlaws who were hellbent on reading books that were banned. “It’s ‘Science Fiction’,” Gladys told me, “but if you’re gonna read one book, and if you’re a lover of books as I can see you are, then this is the on you’ll take home.” Phew. Fiction. Thank goodness. But what the hell? (My favorite expression from ages 6 to 14, to my parents’ chagrin.) A society that burns books? The hero is a book burner?

“Yes, but he becomes a hero because he bucks the system, though I shouldn’t say any more about it … don’t wanna ruin it for you,” Gladys offered.

I took the book home, and I had an affair with it. Bradbury’s fictional society (which in my teen years looked far less fictional as our ultra conservation PTO attempted to ban a number of books, including To Kill a Mockingbird). I fell in love with F451 … I loved the protagonist. I loved everything, except for the very last period. I resented that punctuation mark with all my might.

If I could … which is to say, if Gladys were still alive … I would very happily make a special trip to the Clayton Public Library and give a big giant hug to one of my favorite librarians of all time. Sometimes I believe that Gladys taught me everything useful I’ll ever need to know. I treat her as my own special patron saint of the written word. Thanks to her, I have a spiritual, albeit secular core and a cornucopia of texts to support it (not least of which is the ouvre of Kurt Vonnegut).

Speaking of Vonnegut …

In A Man without a Country (2004) Vonnegut entreats us to honor the librarian. Any librarian. Doesn’t matter. Just pick one. Or several. Honor the Gladys in your life. Why celebrate those among us who stand sentry at the portal to collections—meager to vast—of the printed word? Vonnegut explains: “… I want to congratulate librarians, not famous for their physical strength, their powerful political connections or great wealth, who, all over this country have staunchly resisted anti-democratic bullies who have tried to remove certain books from their shelves, and destroyed records rather than have to reveal to thought police the names of persons who have checked out those titles.” The so-called “Patriot Act” slickly enshrouds all manner of sins, a veritable cornucopia of civil rights transgressions, and it has made us all into potential enemies of THE STATE. A good and wise friend of mine—a lay philosopher who’s wisdom comes in part from 20 years tattooing a luciously diverse procession of customers who’ve come into his shop—recently told me that the biggest difference between most European countries and the U.S.A. is this: In those countries, the government fears the citizenry, whereas here the citizenry is terrified of its government. Granted, this sweeping generalization is … well … a generalization. But no sooner had he finished this sentence, I felt a surge of resonance roll through my mind. “Yep, that’s about right,” I replied. And I meant it. Just as we are not all treated equal, Constitution notwithstanding, we feel varying degrees of fear vis-a-vis THE MAN. For the most part, I can’t honestly say that I believe in the very notion of “the hero.” I believe firmly that stoking the embers of hero-worship distracts us from actually doing truly heroic things, like being kind to one another, defending an underdog, or standing up to a government agent hell-bent on burning “treasonous” books and confiscating information about the library patrons who’ve checked out those books (whether or not they actually read them, or for what purpose was never relevant). Across the country, thousands of librarians — stereotypically meek, nerdy perhaps, maybe a bit persnickety (Dewey Decimal System?) — stood up to THE MAN. In so doing they breathed some of the long-lost life back into the Constitution and Bill of Rights. They protected us, defended us, and they did so without our asking. They knew what was right and they took action accordingly. At no point was or is it clear that they won’t suffer adverse consequences for their heroism. In my book, this makes them heroic. In a word, the librarians were acting patriotically, inspired by a commitment to democracy and in opposition to fascist tactics designed and executed by our very own government, the monolithic juggernaut that frightens us so badly. I hereby pronounce this date “Hug a Librarian Day.” Go find one of these patriots and express your gratitude, thank them for defending you against the thought police. Let me know how it goes. I look forward to hearing from you.

* I dedicate this blog post to Gladys, all the other librarians who’ve ushered me into variously creepy, hilarious, thrilling, suspense-filled, dark, bright, and otherwise NEW worlds since then. In particular, I write this in honor of Jessica Speer, one of my very favorite people of all time, a new friend whose noble calling paves her way into my personal pantheon of patron saints.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

ASA Vegas Bingo Card (orgtheory.net)

 

Your ASA Vegas Bingo Card « orgtheory.net.

Soon a couple thousand sociologists (read: overeducated, largely naive, socially inept narcissists hellbent on studying human societies in a ways that sap the intrigue and energy from the chosen subject matter, leaving it limp and anemic, as lifeless as a corpse on a morgue slab — and YES, I am a sociologist … so FUCK you if my characterization pisses you off) will descend upon the City of Las Vegas, like a wet blanket might be thrown upon two people deep in the steamy throes of a mating ritual, like a math word problem that hums in your brain when you’re fucking somebody really hot, to the point where the humming keeps you from coming. That’s us: Sociologists, modern-day spirit killers. Trust me, our collective headiness will undermine the carnality of Vegas and thus contribute to the ongoing Disneyfication of that once debauched hamlet in the Nevada desert.

If you want to know what our annual conventions are like, check out the ASA meeting “Bingo Card” developed by an Australian colleague whom I’ve never met but intend to seek out as soon as I’ve arrived in Sin City.  Clearly he possesses the charming quality of not taking himself –or this field/discipline– too seriously.  He’s got a sense of humor, and that’s pretty rare among our species.

In the next iteration of this bingo card, I think my Australian chum should include a square titled “Hearing the phrase ‘ways in which’ when the word “how” would suffice.”  This annoying, pretentious phrase has been the centerpiece of my “destroy sociological egghead pretenses” campaign, launched originally in 1997 (the year I stole my doctorate from UCSB).  Seriously, who the fuck says “ways in which” … Another annoying speech pattern involves insertion of the phrase “sort of” prior to the utterance of a statement of whose veracity the speaker feels uncertain.  We use it when we want to say something that we think is original (but really isn’t b/c there really isn’t a fucking thing new under this goddamned sun) but also wish to hedge our bets and give our conversation partner some material they can use to help us save face when our original commentary turns out to be illogical, stupid, hackneyed, or just plain off the mark.  Here’s how it goes:  ”So it’s sort of a Foucauldian (yeah, we actually use that word, though we all pronounce it differently and none of us know what Foucault really meant by anything he wrote .. but we pretend ..) analysis that sort of speaks to (yeah, everything speaks to something something else, all of these ideas chattering away) how the neo-colonial regime (i’m not even kidding) panders to the post-structuralist Marxian (Marx once wrote, “I am not a Marxist” … I wish people would read Marx before citing him) … and that’s how I sort of get to the conclusion that … blah blah skippy.

So much hot fucking noxious gaseous air.  Sociological discourse is like a Hindenburg filled with State Fair attendees’ farts.  Smells the same, and just about as useful.  But kind of fun to sniff and then run away laughing.

My own Bingo card will look different.  It’ll include sights, sounds, and sensations experienced largely off the conference grid.  If I attend three sessions, I’ll have tripled my average.  Instead, I’ll be spending time in the “underworld” of Rounders games, strip clubs, brothels, dope dens, crackhouses, and other places of ill repute.  Ideally, I’ll find a donkey and some fireworks, two critical ingredients for a spectacular, nee mind-blowing, evening.

Roaming the halls of ASA conventions always amuses me. Mostly I spend time watching sociologists stand on the sidelines watching their fellow sociologists’ miserable, usually unsuccessful attempts to interact with one another.  Watching of watching — this is the activity that will punctuate all of the very serious fucking off that I intend to do while there.  After all, it’s Vegas … and what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas, right?

I’m a sociologist.  You’re a sociologist.  Everybody’s a fucking sociologist.  If you’re a sociologist, I hope that I’ve amused you with this entry.  If you’re pissed, then fuck you.  For you “civilians” out there, do yourself a favor and come to Vegas for our convention this coming weekend.  Barge in, march up, and try to force us into conversation.  You’ll reduce us to whimpering masses of sweat and tears.  Once you’ve turned your back, though, we’ll gather ourselves together and watch you safely from a distance, probably from the bar, as most of us are addicted to alcohol, pills, and/or conference fucks.

I’ll be reporting (blogging, twittering, and Toutcasting) live from Vegas … So tune in, if nothing else, you’ll laugh your ass off, in between bouts of crying (especially if you’re paying college tuition for a kid who’s decided on sociology as a major).

–Greg Scott, Ph.D.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Junky Shit

Earl Dukuo here. I’m Greg Scott’s best friend. Or so he says. He lies sometimes. Wait, that’s me, I’m the one who lies. I’m a fucking junky, a societal discard, social garbage, the “lost cause” on the posters your beloved children see during abstinence education in their prison-like schools. And I just took a typical “junk sick” shit. Taking the shit–massive, warm, and bowel-clearing–made me think about my body.

The junky’s body. Every junky’s body. Sitting there on the throne enjoying the release, I realized how important THE BODY is to the junky. We junkies obsess over our bodies. We conduct surveillance on our bodies like we’re undercover federales working a fucking human trafficking case. Every little wart or cyst or abscess, every occurrence inside the body, every muscle or joint flare-up hits our radar, pulsating there as we run recon missions to figure out its etiology. Usually we conclude that “the dope caused it” or “having no dope caused it.” Whatever the ailment, dope’s either the culprit or the panacea. Heroin causes XYZ.

One thing for certain, heroin causes constipation. It can be severe at times. A buddy of mine, a guy I used to boost with, he had to have his shit taken our surgically. Yeah, surgical defecation. They removed 6.5 pounds of fecal matter from his bowels, intestines overflowing. He could’ve died. I kinda wish he would’ve. Years later he fucked me over on a wire lick, left me holding the bag, so to speak. Fuck him and his surgically removed shit. But I digress. The typical bowel movement on dope is … well … way short of gratifying. Some people read a magazine article, maybe two, while they’re “pooping.” Well, when I go to take a shit (every 4 or 5 days, with superior hydration and a decent diet), I take Crime and Punishment, War and Peace, or some other classical and VERY LONG tome. Finally, when I’m able to bear down hard enough to squeeze out some solid waste, all I see there assembled at the throat of the bowl is 5 or 6 pellets the size of marbles, as though they’ve gathered together to form a post-evacuation meeting. “How do you think that went?” one turd asks another. “Good, man, good. We gave him a real fight, a REAL fight this time. And we fended off the removal of the QUEEN.” By “Queen,” they mean the 3-5 pound mass of excrement still lodged in my fucking intestine.

Anyway, junk is a way of life. Or so Burroughs said. One thing’s for sure, though: It not only affects your body, it becomes your body. Junkies are transfixed by their bodily functions. We think about our body every minute: How’s the pulse? The bowels? The lower back? My breathing okay? How’s the abscess? My veins punching out or shrinking up? It’s a constant surveillance system. I don’t know which comes first, the obsession with physical functioning or the heroin. Either way, they reinforce each other. Once you’re a junky, your self surveillance reaches new heights. Every six hours you’re consuming a substance that profoundly changes your body, usually taking you from sick to well, but rarely getting you high. That’s another myth … junkies sit around nodding all day long. Shit, not anymore, maybe in the first few months. Now I shoot this shit just to feel normal, to feel the way other people seem to feel without the aid and assit of H. Feeling normal, taking a good, normal shit. That’s all I get from each of the four or five bags I run (mainline) every day.

I’m as addicted to the back and forth of sick to well as I am to the heroin itself. It’s the roller coaster ride I love … going from calm to tense to scared and back to calm. It’s not just the thrill, it’s the anticipation of the thrill, and it’s the falling off the thrill. Even being sick gives me a distorted sense of comfort. Addiction is a many-sided thing. You got the junk, you got the process of getting the junk, the process of injecting it, all the rituals surrounding enjoying it, and then the sick-well pendulum. All of it combined … lifestyle. Junk is a way of life. Maybe that old, bitter, sad sack of flesh Burroughs made a good point.

One of the only things that makes me feel good when I’m junk sick, going through withdrawal, is taking the kind of shit I just took. That sort of intestinal evacuation comes along very rarely. But when it hits, man, when the bowels start rumbling and getting to the toilet couldn’t happen fast enough, it redeems the whole sick experience.
How often do you think about your shit?

Thanks, Greg. Shout out to ya for letting me write in your blog. Killer Soul. –E. Dukuo

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Drugs, Sex, and Harm Reduction | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Last week, Time Out Chicago sent a photographer to my house to make photographs of some of my tattoos.  One of their reporters interviewed me three times about the work I’ve done and how it has inspired some of the 15-25 (depending on how you count) tattoos on my person.  It was a pretty cool break from the daily grind of writing, filming, editing, whoring myself to the highest bidder.  Although I had a few doubts about the writer — she was so reticent on the phone, and our dialogue seemed uncomfortably stilted — I must say that she ended up producing densely knit, poignant, compelling prose.  So kudos to her and to the photog, who did a decent job creating images.     DePaul professor Greg Scott | Chicago ink – This week in Chicago – Time Out Chicago.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted on by 2:30 Dirty | Comments Off

Deranged Conformist

Beatrice stands alone, cooly though self-consciously smoking an American Spirit Light, which she calls a “square” (regretfully not knowing why she calls it that), at the top of the concrete steps that lead to the university library entrance.  Furiously texting on her Blackberry, periodically issuing a chuckle, her outfit screams “look at me, I’m more unique than you are”:  black fishnet stockings, a short black wrap-around skirt fastened with a gigantic safety pin, layered “beaters” under a ripped black Melvins concert t-shirt manufactured at least 10 years after she was born and 20 years after the band last played a live gig, and a pair of oversized black frame Ray-Bans.  As she begins the process of lowering herself to a seated position on the ground, Justin bounds up the steps and stops short of running her over.

“Hey, sorry we got interrupted … that guy’s letting me sleep on his couch this weekend.  So I kinda had to talk to him,” he explains.

“That’s cool.  I had to text my roommate about graduation weekend and shit.  Her parents and my parents want to say in our apartment, and it’s like so not cool, so I’m all ‘Well, I moved in here first, so like I kind of like have like … seniority?’  She like didn’t like that at all.  Anyway, I had to deal with her. Oh, wait, she’s texting me again.”

Beatrice frowns as she reads the text message.  Within 10 seconds she pokes out a response.  During this 10-second period Justin follows suit and lowers his body to the ground and pretends to adjust his iPod.  ”Okay, yeah …” Beatrice mumbles.

Justin interrupts: “So where were we … yeah, um, you were telling me about last summer ….”

Beatrice (her friends like her B.B., which she spells “BeaBea” but which she transforms to Be-Be on Twitter but Bee-Bee on Facebook) pounces on the above ellipsis … three dots that always signify to her an opportunity to prevail conversationally: “Yeah, last summer … it’s like … all complicated …”

“Right,” Justin blandly stammers.

 ”Being that I’m like this like deranged like queer anarchist feminist like revolutionary and all it was like totally ironic that last summer I went through this like ironically crazy semi-traditional like 50s housewife like phase where I was like wearing these like totally ironic house dresses and cleaning the apartment like mad and cooking and doing all this like craft shit. Then, like this year, it was relevant and ironically like … useful … because it turns out that I’m doing my like honors thesis on like the whole idea of ‘the housewife’ (here she forms double quotation marks in the air with the index and middle fingers of both hands, though in representing her commentary I’m abiding by standard grammatical code and using the single quotation mark as a convention to denote emphasis inside of quoted dialogue) … and how it’s changed … and like how it hasn’t changed, like … ironically … over the past like 50 years or whatever.”

“Yeah … irony. That is ironical.  Totally.  It reminds me of like this Sinatra thing that I went through like a year ago. Seriously.  I was all … like going out to like old people nightclubs, like actual nightclubs, and I was going out a lot and drinking bourbon on the rocks and wearing suits and basically like just listening to Frank Sinatra music like all the time.”

Bea-Bea jumps in to add, with a hint of ridicule, perhaps in response to Justin’s obviously erroneous conversion of “ironic” into an adverb,  and a dash of embarrassment, perhaps over not knowing who Frank Sinatra is: “Yeah that is ironical.”

Without missing a beat, Justin feebly interjects: “Totally.  Irony exists. It’s dripping with it.”

To this observer the “it” in question remains a mystery.  We shall continue nevertheless, for the story unfolds with a jerk as we return to Justin’s abject failure to nudge this mating ritual “to the next level” as they say.  (Note: To this observer, exactly who “they” are remains a mystery):

“If you werent so busy I’d invite you to dinner with us tonight.”  (I warned you about the abject failure)

As though unexpectedly shot by a pellet, B.B. nearly convulses and barks, “YEAH, I’d love to … but I can’t ….”  Over the top of “but I can’t,” Justin too barks “but you’re way too busy with shit.”  It’s just one segment of a cacophonous two track score to a B-movie romantic comedy unfolding before this observer’s eyes.  The observer must look away, but he continues listening as Bee-Bee changes subject, a not uncommon tactic in situations like this one.

“Yay!  We’re graduating this month!!!”

Obviously reeling from the rebuff, Justin half-heartedly climbs aboard the train leading away from “bagging this bird” as he might have said during his Sinatra-obsessed summer of last.  ”Yeah I can’t really believe it.  Worst part is I can’t go to work shitfaced anymore.  Last summer I went to work drunk every day.  That Sinatra thing …” he trails off, fading into oblivion in the presence of anarchy, queerdom, feminism, revolution, and a cascade of flowery frocks.

Beatrice, now buoyed by her full first name and nearly all of the identity markers to which she so vigorously adheres, replies: “Yeah, like in high school I never drank or smoked.  But I’m in this ironic phase now.  Drinking but not all shit faced.  In the morning I’m all spreading out my books in the library and all like ‘I’m gonna stay here forever’ (again she uses the double quotation fingers, and again I must use the single). But then I’m like ‘This is comfortable,’ and I fall asleep.  Nap for like a full half hour.  Then I’m all like … refreshed and ready to study hardcore.  I can’t believe how high my GPA is going to be.  It’s really ironic.”

“Oh yeah, for sure,” says the seemingly disembodied voice whose words seem to have their source in a being that only superficially and ironical-ly goes by the name of Justin, a being so far away now as to be barely visible to the ironically naked eye.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in proSAYic | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Presentation of the Addicted Self in Everyday Life: The Case of the Junky

* Originally published in my blog “Sawbuck City Chronicles” on Tuesday, September 23, 2008.

Everyone knows an addict. A drug addict, specifically. But many people often don’t know that a drug addict travels in the same orbit they do. But when an addict’s particular addiction comes to light, when someone discovers her addiction, how do we expect the addict to present herself? The presentation of self in everyday life, a la sociologist Erving Goffman, stands sentry at the gates of scholarship on the topic. In this entry I want to tease out some of the finer points of an addict’s presentation of self in relation to others, especially the allegedly non-addicted, “high functioning,” and “normal” people who surround her.

In our everyday interactions, we attempt to maintain “coherence,” or integration of our identity as it plays out on the stage of interaction with others and as it unfolds behind closed doors, where only our most intimate others might observe us (if even them). And we also work very hard in our interactions to develop a mutually agreeable “definition of the situation.” In short, we strive to present ourselves as coherent, integrated beings and convince others that the way we have defined ourselves, as evidenced by self presentation, is the correct way for them to define us, too.

All of this is to say that defining the situation and our relative character and character roles requires interaction and a tacit contract of understanding between and among the parties. Discordance and conflict arises when one party views the other as incoherent, as somehow insufficiently integrated as an actor in the situation. The “bum” on the street or the strung out addict, for example, present to us incoherent selves. Their begging entails references to unemployment, or military service, or other creditable endeavors, but the problem is that these references evoke grand, even noble, enterprises entirely contraindicated by this person’s presentation of self (e.g., Soldiers are strong and dignified and therefore could not look like this).

Now, when a person’s self-presentation deviates from how we define the situation, we’ll let them off the hook as long as their presentation of self bears witness or evinces attachment to some greater, more ostensible upright and proper frame or context. The recovering addict, now clean and sober, who stands before us talking about how his service in Vietnam brought him into a world of heroin, which led to a 20-year career as a junky, is acceptable to us because it allows us to conclude that the soldier’s willpower, stamina, moxie, and perseverance (the noble qualities of the good soldier) permitted his recovery. At this point we conclude that the stated addiction, although 20 years in length, was a “blip,” a misstep, a minor setback in his overall moral trajectory.

Junkies must display characteristics associated with “legitimate” concerns, enterprises, and/or ideologies in order for us to accept what they’re saying about themselves or anything else. In short, the junky must be “recovering,” abstinent, even abstemious. The junk must be in the past, and we must agree with the junky’s definition of himself as a being capable of KEEPING the junk in the past. All of this requires a great deal of work on the junky’s part, for he must convince us to gamble on a racehorse who broke its leg two years ago. If the junky’s presentation of self fails to marshal evidence of puritanical washing, cleansing, or attachment, then we dismiss the junky as “just a fucking junky.” Or maybe we allow our knee-jerk liberal sensibilities to lead us down the pity path: Oh, I feel so sorry for this victim of society.

Even when the junky assumes full responsibility for his actions (which we expect of ALL junkies, recovering or active), we deny him this right by citing “push factors” such as a bad family, growing up in a bad neighborhood, and/or other forms of victimization that propelled this otherwise noble character into bad ways. Academicians, scholars, who study heroin users tend to adopt this paradigm, swallowing it hook, line, and sinker. Society created this junky. Inadvertently, however, the professor has stripped the junky of what might be the only source of capital he has left, the only area of life over which he feels even a modicum of control: His addiction to junk.

When an active junky appears before us, we notice the track marks, the stigmata. Or we note the mannerisms we associate with deviance (shiftiness, inadequate eye contact, etc.), and we telecast our disapproval verbally and non-verbally. This makes things awkward. But if the active junky says the right things and acts just the right way, we’ll agree on the situation and allow the junky to assume the role he’s trying to assume. This is a rare occasion. Typically, the junky’s behavior (actions, speech, etc.) will be held accountable to his “master status” of JUNKY. So if he’s being particularly generous or helpful or polite, we conclude that he’s running game, pulling a con, taking us for a ride, or at least trying to. But oh, we’re too smart to let him get away with that. If, on the other hand, he’s engaged in bad behavior, if he’s stealing or lying or just “treacherin’”, then we say, “That’s exactly what I expected of a fucking junky.” Either way, the junky is held accountable for BEING a junky. No matter what he does, good or bad, it’s a result of his desire to advance his cause AS a junky. It’s a no-win situation.

What’s the most shameful thing you’ve ever done? Cheated on a lover, partner, or spouse? Have you killed someone? Have you told a lie with huge implications? Have you gotten an enemy unfairly fired? Whatever it is, imagine that for the rest of your life, all of your behaviors and words will be taken as evidence that you ARE what you did. A confusion of act and being. Imagine that you will forever be held accountable for the action, but more so for BEING the actor who naturally succumbed to the implacable evil that dwells within you.

Imagine: You are a junky.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Drugs, Sex, and Harm Reduction | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Living in the “Home of the Junkies”

Originally published on my blog “Sawbuck City Chronicles,” February 2, 2008

Eight years ago I began living with, filming, researching, and writing about “junkies” on Chicago’s west side and in Cicero, a highly urban suburb adjacent to Chicago. My first contact with this particular addict community occurred through a health promotion program called the Chicago Recovery Alliance, which provides many street-level services, including sterile syringe exchange.

Soon after becoming a CRA volunteer, the Executive Director asked me to assume the unpaid post “Director of Research.” I readily and happily agreed. That’s how this phase of my “life with junk” began. Since January 2001 I have become a professional junky … a sociologist filmmaker who prefers his “family” of heroin addicts, crackheads, and prostitutes to just about any other group of people. In this blog I will reflect on the days and ways of “dope fiend life” and on how the people I have come to know, to love, and occasionally to detest have figured into my life, and how I have figured into theirs.

On occasion my “friends” will post their own accounts through the poetry, short stories, films, and photographs they create. I want this blog to serve as conduit for their communication to you.

To paraphrase and possibly bastardize William T. Vollmann, I make a living out of putting myself in extreme situations wherein fellow humans face seemingly implacable adverse forces, and then I try to make sense of it all. Only in these moments of shame, degradation, loathing, fear, and defilement am I really able to grasp, understand, or comprehend how humans in general operate as a species endowed with a capacity for moral calculation.

Extreme situations constitute the “laboratory” in which I attempt to learn about the nature, extent and range, typology, application, and distortions of morality. Only here, on these streets, in this “pay by the hour” motel room on Madison Street where I’m currently holed up with two hookers, a copper wire thief, and a strung out heroin dealer, can I begin to make sense of it all.

This is not a subculture. The term “subculture” presupposes, etymologically speaking, the undisputed existence of a primary article, i.e., dominant culture. Not once in my entire sociological career, which admittedly spans only 20 years, have I encountered a satisfactory definition or delineation of the “dominant culture” that we “mainstream” people presumably share.

Culture is an outcome, and it’s a dynamic, ever-changing one at that. It’s the “Y variable” in a regression equation; it’s the dependent variable explainable, they say, via manipulation of theoretically specified independent variables, or factors. Ultimately, culture consists of the over-determined series of adaptions humans mount when dealing with material and symbolic conditions whose existence they cannot eradicate, dismiss, control, or otherwise manipulate. So if there is no single, unifying, overarching or undergirding CULTURE, then there can be no sub-culture.

Finally, the term subculture implies inferiority, or at least subservience. Once you get to know any network, confederation, or community of addicts, you’ll find that their cultural systems have more in common with traditional notions of culture than not. Powerful stakeholders, especially in the media, often work very hard to obscure these similarities, because, let’s face it, the crafting of representations is big business. And in the media, profit lives and breathes on the iron lung of advertising. So the more lurid, caricatured, outrageous, and provocative the representation, the more likely people will consume it. And if they’re consuming the representation, then they’re a captive audience during the break for “station identification and a word from our sponsors.”

A good junky is a horrifying junky. We want to see what we expect to see in representations of junkies and junky culture. But I’m going to spend a fair amount of time and expend significant energy in this blog demonstrating to you how similar the junky and straight worlds really are. In fact, I’ll show you how the junky world not only parallels the straight world but represents a magnification and intensification of the straight world’s fundamental tenets. Put simply, there is a junky in every one of us. Every community and culture bears the seeds of “junkyville.” The world of the junky is our world, laid bare like a desiccated worm on sun-scorched pavement. Junky culture is ugly only to the extent that mainstream culture is hideous.

In room #4 at the Grand Motel, the porn channel runs constantly. The channel knob is lodged in place. A dear friend by the name of Earl Dukuo, a solid Indiana corn-fed fella, sits next to me, fishing for vein in his upper arm with a BD syringe, 1/2″, 28 gauge. Tonight’s delivery: A jab of rock (13 “dime” bags) and 1 full oz. of wholesale-cut (i.e., pretty strong) white powder heroin. Earl threw some Dorman sleeping pills on the dope, stepped it out, bagged up, and now it’s time to test out the product before the customers get here. Earl, Big Hands Lucy, Copper Kyle, and me, 2:30 Dirty (my nickname), are shooting dice, a game called 10,000 … and if you’ve got any experience with crack, you know how soothing that game can be. Okay, gotta roll … I’m up next.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Drugs, Sex, and Harm Reduction | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment